Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2020_06_24 Board Minutes Moreno, Brandi -D91 From:D91 Zone 2 - Paul Haacke, Board Trustee Sent:Monday, July 13, 2020 1:32 PM To:Moreno, Brandi -D91 Subject:Re: statement from June 24th meeting Attachments:Motion on Grading 3rd trimester.docx Sorry Brandi, tried to get this to you several times last week but the email was done until I left for Lake Powell where I didn't have access to wifi. Glad the email is now working again. I've attached my motion for the record. Thank you and see you Wednesday. Paul From: Moreno, Brandi -D91 Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2020 6:41 PM To: D91 Zone 2 - Paul Haacke, Board Trustee Subject: statement from June 24th meeting Paul rd Would you like to send me a copy of your statement you made when making the motion for the appeal process for 3 trimester grades so I can include it in the official minutes? Thanks! Brandi Moreno Administrative Assistant to Superintendent Boland & Board Secretary Idaho Falls School District 91 p 208.525.7518 f 208.525.7596 1 Questions: 1. Will there be any notation on transcripts with what has been recommended? Madam Chairperson, I would like to make a motion. I would first like to thank Superintendent Bolland and the District 91 staff, teachers and parents who took hours of time to come up with their recommendation on what to do with the third trimester grades. I know that hours of research has been done and hours of discussion took place for them to come to the conclusion and recommendation they have. I have also spent my time researching what other districts both inside and outside of Idaho are doing which is moving towards letter grades. In my research I have spoken to administrators at colleges and universities on how they evaluate applications and review transcripts. I have personally reached out to parents of District 91 students and have spoken to them about their personal experiences working with universities and how their child has been disadvantaged with our current Pass or Incomplete system. I believe the District 91 Board made the best decision on a pass incomplete system at the time with the information we had. I believe the pass incomplete system will still meet many of our student’s needs today. I also believe that we are placing some, not all but many of our students at a disadvantage by not providing them the opportunity to have a letter grade. I feel, as I’m sure we all do, we need to place our students first and give them an opportunity to compete on an equal playing field with students not only in Idaho but across the country. Now for the motion. Based on what I have learned from my inquiries and research I propose we follow the special committee’s recommendation of allowing students to petition their teachers, as outlined, class by class, for a letter grade. I would also like to emphasize the point that was made in the presentation which is students should receive the benefit of the doubt. We, as a Board, placed the bar at the 70% mark. We set that standard. Students may have worked to surpass the 70% mark but other students whose history shows they are a better student but also set the mark at 70%. They should not be penalized by the bar we set. I ask that teachers take this into account as they consider the petitions from those students who elect to petition for a letter grade.